Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Builders Supplies
 
 
Friday, 3rd September 2010

Canatxx gas bid set for rejection

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
21 January 2010
ANTI-Canatxx campaigners have reached a milestone in their fight to stop gas being stored under the River Wyre after County Hall planning officers recommended refusal of the plan.
Planning chiefs say the American firm, which wants to store 1.2 million tonnes of gas in caverns, has failed to provide enough information to ensure the Preesall geology is capable of accommodating the development.

The company has also been criticised for failing to prove gas could not migrate through the geology or via former mining activities.

Concerns were also raised that the £300m development would be "detrimental to the quality of the open character of the countryside, coastal plain, estuary landscape and Wyre Way".

Jubilant MPs and neighbours, who have fought two previous planning applications, welcomed the recommendation and said they now hoped Canatxx would "pack up and go home".

Ian Mulroy, chairman of Protect Wyre Group, said: "We are very pleased and we feel the refusal has been recommended for all the right reasons – because of the lack of information from Canatxx.

"We have still got to go before the committee but we feel confident they will uphold the planning officers' recommendation. Canatxx may pack up and go home now."

The recommendation comes just a week before the county council's development control committee is due to make a decision on the planning application.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 January 2010 8:43 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Fleetwood
 
 
 

Today's Vote

What would you like to see the Marine Hall used for?
purely as an entertainment venue
as a conference facility
something else


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.